Two Australian Aircrews Encounter "Green Object Climbing And Descending Vertically", Airspace Management Authority Releases File
There are currently two Australian government
agencies who are equipped to, and indeed do, accept UFO reports from civil
aviation flight crews. They are the Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB)
and Airservices Australia (ASA). Of course, they do more than deal with
infrequent UFO reports, and, in fact, are responsible for airspace management,
the functionality of airports, pilot licensing, air safety, navigational
systems, etc. Australia’s Department of Defence (DoD) also accepts and
processes UFO reports, but their system is quite different from those of the
ATSB and ASA. The DoD’s Directorate of Defence Aviation and Air Force
Safety (DDAAFS) accepts reported military UFO cases via a form called an “Air
Safety Occurrence Report” (ASOR). ASOR’s are processed through the Defence
Aviation Hazard Reporting and Tracking System (DAHRTS), and are studied within
the Closed Loop Hazard/ASOR Review and Tracking System. DDAAFS military UFO reports have proven
very hard to obtain. But ATSB and ASA reports have been somewhat easier. For
the purpose of this piece, I will focus on ASA. Describing themselves as “…a
government owned corporation providing safe, secure, efficient and
environmentally responsible services to the aviation industry” ASA is responsible
for national airspace management, air traffic control, aeronautical information
services, aviation communication, radio beaconing, and the like. Some
time ago I submitted a Freedom of Information (FOI) request for any UFO, or UFO–like,
reports submitted to ASA by flight crews, with the date range of 2008 to 2015.
I published the results of that effort in January, 2015, and my findings can be
looked at here.
Also, as an aside, I have also had the ATSB furnish me with numerous reports of
aerial unknowns, and the results of that work can be found here.
In my previous
FOI request to ASA, I stipulated they search their “Electronically Submitted
Incident Report” (ESIR) database and the newer “Corporate Integrated
Reporting and Risk Information System” (CIRRIS) for UFO events dating from
2008 onwards. Of course, one would assume, correctly as it turns out, that
pilot–submitted UFO reports go back much further than that. The reason for me
not asking for all material dating back to, say, the 1980’s, is because
an FOI requestor can be knocked back if their request is to broad, or, will
cause an unacceptable burden for administrative staff. So, one often breaks
these requests for data up into smaller date range blocks. Needless to say, as
soon as the last FOI request was furnished, I submitted another one. On the 30th
of January, 2015 I submitted a new FOI request to ASA for all UFO or UFO–like
cases dated between 1992 and 2008. Specifically, my request stated:
“….any incidences where flight
crews have reported any: 1) Unusual, Unknown, or Unidentifiable Aircraft or
Objects; 2) Suspected Drones/Unmanned Aerial Vehicles; 3) Meteoric events,
fireballs and the like; and, 4) Especially unusual weather phenomenon; which
are held on the Electronically Submitted Incident Report (ESIR) database or the
“Corporate Integrated Reporting and Risk Information System” (CIRRIS) database.”
On the 18th of February, 2015
Sasha Pesic, ASA’s Freedom of Information & Privacy Contact Officer/Legal
Inquiries Coordinator, asked me if I would grant them an extension of time in
searching their database(s) and preparing any found material, which, despite
not being famous for my patience, I agreed to. On the 7 May, 2015, I received
the results of my request. At one page, in PDF form, ASA supplied me with 3 UFO
or related events in table form, which is imaged below.
One case stands out. In June, 1999 two
airplanes experienced what, by anyone’s measure, must be considered a
potentially important UFO event. In ASA’s “Executive Summary” column it is
dryly stated:
“Pilots of AJP and AJK enroute for
Alice Springs sighted an unidentified green object in their vicinity. No
details of any other traffic held by Brisbane Sector 11.”
In the “Description” column it is stated:
“At 1015 the pilot of AJP Tindal
for Alice Springs reported sighting a green object climbing and descending
vertically and paralleling his track for some time. The pilot of AJK Darwin for
Alice Springs reported sighting this green object as well. No details of any
other traffic were held by Brisbane Sector 11.”
The document in question is imaged below.
While lacking further narrative, there is
enough here to demonstrate that flights AJP and AJK saw something worth
reporting, and the incident occurred at a significant altitude, as we shall
see. Obviously, it is one thing for a single flight crew to report a UFO event.
But when two flight crews report the same thing, the story is much hard to
brush aside. If equal importance is the data which also comes with the report.
The UTC Date/Time data is listed as “199906231015”, which is Coordinated
Universal Time (the old Greenwich Mean Time), translates as the year 1999, on
the 23erd of June, at 10:15am. As the event occurred while both aircraft were
enroute to Alice Springs, flying from the north, this equates to 1945hrs in
central Australia, or, 7:45pm. The event occurred in the “TOPS” airspace sector
of Australia, which is a volume of airspace located in the Northern Territory
(NT). The “Primary Occurrence Type” is listed as “MISCELLANEOUS”, with a
further comment stating “(INC PILOT REPORT)”, which one presumes means the
event included a pilot(s) report. The “Attribution” of the case is listed as “OTHER”.
Finally, the “Report No” is listed as “2054”.
At that time the sky is quite dark, so,
one may presume that any object that is be described as “green” was almost
definitely luminous. As for the planes involved I have ascertained, through
Australian aircraft registration records, that both were Westwind IAI
1124 business jets built by Israeli Aircraft Industries. These impressive
aircraft carry two crew, and operate at a maximum speed of 865 kilometres per
hour at 29,000 feet, but cruise at 725km/hr at 39–41,000 feet on long flights.
Seeing as the Executive Summary states “Pilots of AJP and AJK enroute for Alice
Springs...”, there is every chance that the aircraft were travelling at a
fairly high velocity, and an altitude of over 29,000 feet.
Whatever the speed, wherever the exact
locale, even the admittedly limited data presented in this single ASA document
does raises some questions. Firstly, what “green object” can seemingly
dip up and down vertically in the atmosphere, and then track with a jet “...for
some time”? We can’t rule out another aircraft, but some of the details given
make this rather unlikely. The mystery flight would need to be carrying a very
singular bright green light aboard, which breaches civil aviation requirements.
Also, one could speculate that the crew of either AJP and AJK would have
attempted communication with other flights in the region, and if they did there
was obviously no positive response. Most importantly, the “Description”
section clearly states that “No details of any other traffic were held by
Brisbane Sector 11.”. In Australia, the Brisbane Sector monitors and controls
all air traffic in the TOPS area, so ASA’s Brisbane Sector effectively admitted
that nothing else was flying in the area. Other explanations may fit, but the
case is eighteen years old, so investigation is not easy. One could safely
assume that the crew’s of the two aircraft in question have long moved on.
Moreover, military records dedicated to, for example, ground–to–air missile
evaluation launches are almost impossible to obtain, even through significant
FOI work. Quite simply, the details of high–end ordinance tests are classified
in Australia, as one would expect. Other solutions, including a gigantic period
of meteoric activity, long–duration space re–entries, reflections on
windscreens, intense hallucinations, rare electrical activity, etc can be ruled
out. The astronomical angle is worth studying, but to conclusively blame a
planet or star for “...climbing and descending vertically...”, then tracking
one of the two flights, pushes the limits of credulity.
In regard to the release of this document,
it is worth noting that ASA had a previous opportunity to make public the case.
As I have detailed, my FOI request was finalised in Feburary, 2015. However,
three years earlier, Australian researcher Keith Basterfield asked ASA for any
information held regarding UFO’s, and the material I have presented in this
report, which dates back to 1999, was not released. Specifically, on the 30th
of May, 2012, Basterfield submitted an FOI request to ASA for:
“…any documents held by Air
Services Australia, on the subject of ‘unidentified flying objects’.”
On the 18th of June, 2012,
Keith was furnished with internal ASA material containing a number of media
enquiries to ASA’s Public Affair’s desk, and a number of general enquiries from
the public. Nothing of note was unearthed. Technically, of course, Basterfield
had asked for records regarding “unidentified flying objects”, and the event I
have highlighted was listed as an “unidentified green object”, with the “Primary
Occurrence Type” listed as “MISCELLANEOUS”, and the “Attribution” listed as “OTHER”.
These details do not contain the specific term ”unidentified flying
objects”, which is what Basterfield had based his FOI request on, so the
failure to release him anything of note probably boils down to a terminology
issue. Usually, FOI staffers will do little more than process the request using
exactly what a requestor has asked about, but surely a search of the ESIR and
CIRRIS databases for the terms “unidentified” and “object” should have come up
with the Alice Springs AJP and AJK event. Whatever the parameters, or
limitations, of ASA record searching are, one can’t help but wonder if further
requests, using a whole list of other keywords, would pick up. We may not have
to wait long. I aim, very soon, to formulate a new FOI request to ASA. It will
include a more robust and wider scope than anything I have done
previously.
No comments:
Post a comment